Shaswot Lamichhane

Shaswot
Lamichhane

Between chapters. Still learning.

Get in touch

01 · The pattern

The patterns gripped me.
Never the slogans.

Hong Kong. The candlelight marches in Seoul. Every major protest with a camera pointed at it. Alone, people are inconsistent and hesitant. In a group, the same tendencies replay — different countries, same script.

Coordination without a coordinator.
Momentum without a plan.

See for yourself

Two hundred strangers. Move your cursor through them — watch a nudge become a direction.

Same question keeps you up at night? saswot.dev@gmail.com

02 · September 2025

The theory left
the notebook.

Years earlier I'd written down a thought: states rarely solve dissatisfaction — they drown it in distraction, and social media is the deepest distraction ever built. Then Nepal banned the platforms overnight.

You are not taking a drug away from one person. You are forcing an entire population into withdrawal — together.
  1. Sept 4 The ban. Every blank feed becomes a protest poster.
  2. Sept 8 ~12,000 people at Maitighar, many in school uniform. Within hours, the state's authority dissolves.
  3. The cost 76 people never went home. This part is not fun, and never will be.
  4. Sept 9 The prime minister resigns. Now the dangerous part: the vacuum.
  5. Sept 9–12 A Discord server — "the Parliament of Nepal" — passes 145,000 members. Polls, fact-checking channels. I was one of the moderators. A mini-election simulation, never a replacement for one.
  6. Sept 12 Former Chief Justice Sushila Karki becomes interim PM. One job: real elections.

The crowd was never the story. The instruments were: public polls, fact-checks, 145,000 witnesses — deliberation at gaming-app speed.

Not a revolution. A stress test: a hollow state met an aligned citizenry, and the state broke first.

I am not the hero of this story. No individual is.

04 · Now

Day job: proving crowds
are made of humans.

Special Project Lead at Tools for Humanity, working on World — proof-of-human for an internet where AI can imitate anyone. From "is this crowd coordinated?" to "is this crowd human?"

I also write · latest essay

How Cross-Pollinating Science Leads to Breakthrough Innovation

"The answer exists. Wrong department."

Open tabs:

  • archival protest footage
  • crowd simulations
  • cooking as thermodynamics
  • Twitter and Tear Gas

September was one dataset. The question is bigger.

Crowds are unpredictable.
My inbox isn't.

Email Shaswot

saswot.dev@gmail.com

How Cross-Pollinating Science Leads to Breakthrough Innovation

The answer exists. Wrong department.

The silo problem

Picture two buildings on the same campus. In one, a materials scientist has just found a cheaper way to make silicon wafers. In the other, a professor is telling students that solar technology isn't economically viable. They are a two-minute walk apart, and their knowledge never meets. We treat knowledge like a collection of locked boxes, each with its own key — physics here, psychology there, chemistry sealed away from the art studio. But that isn't how brains work. Understanding is built through many channels firing at once, weaving ideas together.

Where the magic happens

The breakthroughs we celebrate almost never come from the middle of a discipline. They come from the edges, where fields overlap. Darwin's voyage mixed biology with geology, geography, and philosophy. Watson and Crick needed chemistry, biology, physics, and crystallography in the same room to see the double helix. Steve Jobs kept insisting that technology alone wasn't enough — it was technology married to the liberal arts, to typography, to how people actually feel, that made the difference.

The art of teaching physics

Thermodynamics makes sense in a kitchen. Watch a piece of meat reach perfect doneness and you're watching collagen break down, proteins denature, energy move between molecules — the same principles that run stars and engines. Teach quantum physics through poetry and you find that Heisenberg's uncertainty principle says something artists have always known intuitively: the act of looking changes the thing you look at.

The neuroscience of understanding

When you deeply understand something, your brain doesn't light up in one tidy region. Visual processing, emotional memory, language, and abstract reasoning fire together, building a rich, interconnected representation. Teaching subjects in isolation asks students to think with a fraction of their capacity — like painting with one color, or composing with one instrument.

The Renaissance mindset

Renaissance thinkers never agreed to the locked boxes in the first place. Leonardo's anatomical drawings are scientifically precise and artistically beautiful, and his machines balance function with elegance — because to him these were never separate pursuits.

Breaking down the walls

Our institutions still reward specialization over integration; the incentives all point inward. Yet the most innovative companies and the most interesting researchers are the ones asking sideways questions — what does biology know that could help this piece of software? What does a chef understand that a chemist has forgotten?

The path forward

None of this means abandoning depth. It means recognizing that real expertise includes knowing how your field connects to the ones next door. Education should look more like actual learning: messy, creative, driven by stories rather than syllabi.

The spark

The most profound discoveries are waiting at the intersections, where different ways of knowing meet and make something entirely new. The most important questions don't belong to any single field — which is exactly why someone has to carry them across the walls.

More essays are on the way. If this one sparked something, or you disagree in an interesting way: saswot.dev@gmail.com.